The Woman – My Analysis
Throughout the novel, an aspect of the woman could be that
she represents temptations of the warmth and familiarity within the man’s
memories that he constantly battles against.
It is an unavoidable conundrum that even though all of his memories, for
example the references to nature, connect the protagonist to beauty and
goodness, it only reminds him of the things that no longer exist. For example,
the romantic memory which the man dwells in, “He remembered waking once on such a night to the clatter of crabs in
the pan where he had left steak bones from the night before. Faint deep coals
of driftwood fire pulsing in the onshore wind. Lying under a myriad of stars. The sea’s black
horizon. He rose and walked out and stood barefoot in the sand and watched the
pale surf appear all down the shore and roll and crash and darken again. When he went back to the fire he knelt and
smoothed her hair as she slept and he said if he were God he would have made
the world just so and no different”. This
particular memory happens before the apocalypse where ironically the man thinks
that he would have made the world any other way. Although it is a romantic
piece of imagery, with his wife being a figure of pure perfection, memories
like this make the man’s battle for survival even harder as he feels a strong
constant temptation to let the dreams take control and to simply live in these
memories. As the woman chose not to survive, she could represent the idealism
of being able to live in the memories and not face this new world. The memories of the description of living creatures
and nature are relatable to us and they draw us closer into appreciating the
beauty of smaller things; as readers we can imagine the impact of loosing what
is around us. For example, the opening description of this destructed post-apocalyptic
world, “Nights dark beyond darkness and
the days more gray each one than what had gone before. Like the onset of some
cold glaucoma dimming away the world” epitomises the reason why the
protagonist feels as though he needs the sustenance of the past. We are lead to
question why whether the representations of the memories are the morals of the
world or whether they are a weakness that can be exploited (for example by the
woman). The woman could also be the
temptations of letting the dreams take control; it is as though the suppressed
happy memories from the protagonist are only regarded as distracting.
The woman could also be having an ambiguous function of
representing both the giving of life and the temptation of death. This
symbolism is powerful throughout presenting the irony of the boy being born (a
new life) into an effectively destructed and dead world. The sudden end to the woman’s life constantly
lures the man into a liminal state of feeling between life and death and
drawing closer to wanting escape this world through the influence of her. If the woman represented this aspect, it may further
relate to how although the boy is born, the man dies at the end and we learn
that even though life can be given in this destruction, it can also be taken
away again; it is extremely fragile.
Furthermore, the father is unable to control what happens; is it
considered justice that the woman brought a new life but also took away her own
and left the boy? McCarthy, by drawing
the woman away from the main frame of the plot, could use the woman to
represent both states of life of the man and the boy; we can question whether she
is just a figure and whether she could even be considered the equivalent to a
human. The spirituality the man refers to, is caused
fundamentally by the woman leaving the man close to death and drawn into the
temptations to stop resisting the suffering, “He rose while the boy slept and pulled his shoes and wrapped in his blanket
he walked out through the trees. He descended into a gryke in the stone and
there he crouched, coughing and he coughed for a long time. Then he just knelt
there in the ashes. He raised his face to the paling day. Are you there? He
whispered. Will I see you at last? Have you a neck by which to throttle you?
Have you a heart? Damn you eternally have you a soul?”
McCarthy’s presentation of the connection between the boy and
the mother is vague and distant which we see when the man reflects on the boys
reaction to the mother leaving them, “She’s
gone isn't she?” Although the father
must be strong and distant in order for the boy to be able to survive without
an emotional attachment, as the boy has no motherly figure his vulnerability is
far more evident. This also impacts the
reader to draw closer to the character of the boy and intensifies their vulnerability
and lack of control to the life and fate of the boy. The boy sees so many
horrific things for example, in the cellar scene where the son begs his father
not to go downstairs, and his innocence
to this world creates the whole novel to feel much more disturbing and
impacting. It could also be interpreted that if this motherly figure was more
prominent, it would have a negative impact to the journey that they are trying
to achieve; the woman within the man’s perception appears to be someone who
doubts that they will be able to survive, hence why she ends her own life. The mother also shares the son’s innocence as
we see when she “cradles her belly”
and “clutches the jamb” the son and
the mother in this section are almost symbolised as one person all together. However, as the vulnerability of the boy is
more evident, it causes the attachment of the father and the boy to become
questionably the most essential part of the novel. It is doubtable whether this
is better or worse when the man then leaves as there is only a possibility of
the boy surviving on his own; however we do see that the compassion of the boy
inspires the man at the end, “You have my
whole heart. You always did”.
No comments:
Post a Comment